Sorry, imToken can be a blockchain Instrument and will not custody your belongings. When earning transactions, no expenses are charged by imToken alone, we suggest you to study "gasoline service fees.
Sorry to listen to that. it can be crucial to point out that imToken doesn't custody your property; you will be completely answerable for the security of the property.
为了保障用户资产安全、打造优质加密生态，imToken 致力于普及安全资讯并提供解决方案。
dreadful expertise, as tricky and as high-priced to work with as you can. Will uninstall as soon I am able to remove my tokens. I do not realize why they've manufactured it so challenging to clear away tokens off application scammy.
近来，随着数字货币的火爆，市场上涌现了大量假冒的数字货币钱包。这些假钱包外观上与正版几乎无异，但其内在却暗藏木马程序，一旦用户将资产转入这些假钱包，便会被黑客窃取，给用户造成了难以估量的损失。尤其是知名的imToken钱包，由于其用户基数庞大，成为了假冒者的主要目标。
为匹配用户属地国家的监管政策，imToken 已限制中国境内用户访问和使用部分功能???? 了解详情
● 支持通过一套助记词在单个钱包内添加不同网络上的账户，和在同一网络上派生多个独立账户
A pressured blood attract constitutes a "refusal" in California. Refusing a chemical take a look at has significant effects, including fines, jail time, and suspension in the copyright.
为匹配用户属地国家的监管政策，imToken 已限制中国境内用户访问和使用部分功能???? 了解详情
The courts have ruled which the momentary character of Liquor in the blood causes it to be unreasonable to require a warrant for a forced blood draw. Opponents feel that a compelled blood attract is undoubtedly an invasion of privateness plus a violation of the proper towards self-incrimination.
加一個夜間模式，很難？郵件反饋了一年了，每次都說“謝謝建議”，一年了沒動靜？還有系統通知的適配，什麼時候能完善？交易通知經常延遲，延遲三小時以內都算速度快了。每次都要手動打開去查看交易
抱歉在使用 imToken 时给你造成了疑惑，如果你是确认从正规渠道下载的 imToken ，那么可以无视风险提示继续安装使用。这些风险提示一般是部分地区（如中国大陆）的部分手机厂商、系统的提示，属于误报。imToken 正在努力解决这些不可控因素，致力于给用户带来良好的使用体验。再次感谢你对我们的支持和反馈！
安全始于了解开发者如何收集和分享数据。数据隐私保护和安全措施可能会因您的使用情况、所在地区和用户年龄而异。此类信息由开发者提供，可能会随时间更新。
basic safety starts with knowledge how builders accumulate and share your details. facts privateness and safety practices may perhaps range based on your use, area, and age. The developer provided this information and facts and could update it after some time.
pressured blood draws are allowed under the 1966 U.S. Supreme court docket circumstance of Schmerber v. California. The court ruled that law enforcement can take a here driver's blood and not using a warrant so as to carry out a chemical check.